THE INFLUENCE OF LINGUISTIC POLITENESS STRATEGIES ON EFFECTIVE CLASSROOM INTERACTION AND STUDENT COMMUNICATION PERFORMANCE IN UNIVERSITAS HARAPAN MEDAN
Kata Kunci:
linguistic politeness strategies, classroom interaction, student communication performance, pragmatics, higher education, communicative competenceAbstrak
This study aimed to examine the influence of linguistic politeness strategies on effective classroom interaction and student communication performance at Universitas Harapan Medan. The research employed a mixed-methods approach using a sequential explanatory design, integrating quantitative and qualitative data to provide a comprehensive understanding of the implementation of linguistic politeness strategies in classroom learning. The research process consisted of preliminary observation, needs analysis, instrument development and validation, questionnaire administration, classroom observation, semi-structured interviews, and statistical as well as thematic data analysis. Based on the illustrative simulated dataset, the findings indicate that the implementation of linguistic politeness strategies contributes positively to the development of more effective classroom interaction and improved student communication performance. Lecturers' use of positive politeness strategies promotes a respectful, collaborative, and supportive learning environment, encouraging students to participate actively, express ideas confidently, and engage in meaningful academic discussions. The simulated structural model further suggests that effective classroom interaction functions as a mediating variable that strengthens the relationship between linguistic politeness strategies and student communication performance. These illustrative findings highlight the potential value of integrating pragmatic politeness principles into higher education teaching practices to enhance instructional communication and foster student-centered learning. Future research should employ empirical data from multiple higher education institutions to validate these relationships and improve the generalizability of the findings.
Unduhan
Referensi
Aprianto, D. (2023). Politeness strategies in lecturer–student classroom interaction in higher education. Exposure: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, 12(1), 45–60.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Canale, M. (1983). From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy. In J. C. Richards & R. W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 2–27). London, England: Longman.
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/I.1.1
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Fitriyani, S., & Andriyanti, E. (2020). Teacher politeness strategies in EFL classroom interaction. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 3(3), 171–181.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 3. Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics (pp. 269–293). Harmondsworth, England: Penguin Books.
Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. London, England: Longman.
Mahmud, M. (2019). The use of politeness strategies in the classroom context by English university students. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(3), 597–606.
Mantra, I. B. N., Widiastuti, I. A. M. S., & Handayani, N. D. (2022). Linguistic politeness strategies in online English learning interaction. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 8(3), 145–156.
Nurliana, N., Harahap, R., & Sembiring, R. (2025). Linguistic politeness strategies in university classroom discussion: A pragmatic perspective. English Language Teaching Upgrading, 8(1), 34–49.
Rahayuningsih, D., Saleh, M., & Fitriati, S. W. (2020). Politeness strategies in teacher–student classroom interaction in Indonesian EFL classrooms. English Education Journal, 10(2), 156–170.
Richards, J. C. (2006). Communicative language teaching today. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Sinclair, J. M., & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Thomas, J. (1995). Meaning in interaction: An introduction to pragmatics. London, England: Longman.
Walsh, S. (2006). Investigating classroom discourse. London, England: Routledge.
Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring classroom discourse: Language in action. London, England: Routledge.
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Chapter in a book
Hickey, L. (2001). Perlocutionary Equivalence: Marking, Exegesis and Recontextualisation. In L. Hickey (Ed.), The Pragmatics of Translation (pp. 217-232). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Reference by Mendeley (contoh)
Szmrecsanyi, B. (2006). Morphosyntactic Persistence in Spoken English. (W. Bisang, H. H. Hock, & W. Winter, Eds.). New York: Mouton de Gruyter. http://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197808
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Emmy Erwina, Lisna Sari Siregar, Bima Prana Chitra, Rayyan Naufal, Muhammad Radit Ardiansyah Putra

Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





